Germany vs Philippines: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Germany
- Philippines
How they compare
Germany currently reports 447,658 t against 353,320 t in Philippines, a difference of 94,338 t.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 19th and Philippines ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 400,447 t | 123,266 t | 277,181 t | Germany |
| 1970s | 408,259 t | 178,419 t | 229,840 t | Germany |
| 1980s | 430,027 t | 213,766 t | 216,261 t | Germany |
| 1990s | 411,760 t | 246,636 t | 165,124 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 442,598 t | 307,093 t | 135,505 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 438,944 t | 353,478 t | 85,466 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 441,277 t | 356,338 t | 84,939 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Germany or Philippines?
- Germany, at 447,658 t against 353,320 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Germany and Philippines?
- 94,338 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Philippines rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Germany ranks 19th and Philippines ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).