Guadeloupe vs Nauru: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Guadeloupe
0 t
in 2023
Nauru
15.58 t
in 2023
Guadeloupe rank
201st
Nauru rank
199th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Guadeloupe
  • Nauru
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 15.58 t against 0 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 15.58 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.

Guadeloupe ranks 201st and Nauru ranks 199th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guadeloupe averaged higher in 5 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guadeloupe Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 4,072 t 9.09 t 4,063 t Guadeloupe
1970s 3,226 t 10.34 t 3,216 t Guadeloupe
1980s 2,420 t 11.36 t 2,408 t Guadeloupe
1990s 1,985 t 12.18 t 1,973 t Guadeloupe
2000s 1,446 t 14.58 t 1,431 t Guadeloupe
2010s 0 t 15.49 t 15.49 t Nauru
2020s 0 t 15.5 t 15.5 t Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Guadeloupe or Nauru?
Nauru, at 15.58 t against 0 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Guadeloupe and Nauru?
15.58 t, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Nauru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guadeloupe and Nauru rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Guadeloupe ranks 201st and Nauru ranks 199th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).