Guinea-Bissau vs Liberia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 7,490 t against 7,075 t in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 415 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 141st and Liberia ranks 140th of 201 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,802 t | 3,085 t | 1,283 t | Liberia |
| 1970s | 1,704 t | 4,017 t | 2,313 t | Liberia |
| 1980s | 2,379 t | 4,622 t | 2,243 t | Liberia |
| 1990s | 2,924 t | 3,875 t | 950.39 t | Liberia |
| 2000s | 4,522 t | 5,561 t | 1,040 t | Liberia |
| 2010s | 5,694 t | 6,634 t | 940.29 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 6,976 t | 7,456 t | 479.88 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Guinea-Bissau or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 7,490 t against 7,075 t in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Guinea-Bissau and Liberia?
- 415 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Liberia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Liberia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 141st and Liberia ranks 140th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).