Guyana vs Latvia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Latvia
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 18,680 t against 17,964 t in Latvia, a difference of 716 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Guyana ranks 120th and Latvia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,735 t | 12,849 t | 6,114 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6,914 t | 12,549 t | 5,636 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 12,105 t | 16,618 t | 4,514 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 17,815 t | 20,033 t | 2,218 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Guyana or Latvia?
- Guyana, at 18,680 t against 17,964 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Guyana and Latvia?
- 716 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Latvia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 120th and Latvia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).