Guyana vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- South Sudan
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 18,680 t against 17,754 t in South Sudan, a difference of 926 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Guyana ranks 120th and South Sudan ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13,368 t | 14,163 t | 795.91 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 17,815 t | 16,912 t | 903.25 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Guyana or South Sudan?
- Guyana, at 18,680 t against 17,754 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Guyana and South Sudan?
- 926 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 120th and South Sudan ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).