Haiti vs Israel: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Haiti
- Israel
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 17,930 t against 15,014 t in Israel, a difference of 2,916 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 122nd and Israel ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 5 and Israel in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,244 t | 9,846 t | 4,398 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 16,462 t | 15,946 t | 515.39 t | Haiti |
| 1980s | 17,462 t | 18,316 t | 853.92 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 14,946 t | 15,542 t | 595.31 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 17,243 t | 15,475 t | 1,768 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 23,636 t | 15,632 t | 8,005 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 18,511 t | 14,929 t | 3,582 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Haiti or Israel?
- Haiti, at 17,930 t against 15,014 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Haiti and Israel?
- 2,916 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Israel?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Israel rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Haiti ranks 122nd and Israel ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).