Haiti vs New Zealand: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Haiti
- New Zealand
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 17,930 t against 16,239 t in New Zealand, a difference of 1,691 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 110th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,244 t | 6,249 t | 7,995 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 16,462 t | 8,542 t | 7,919 t | Haiti |
| 1980s | 17,462 t | 10,888 t | 6,574 t | Haiti |
| 1990s | 14,946 t | 13,815 t | 1,131 t | Haiti |
| 2000s | 17,243 t | 15,075 t | 2,168 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 23,636 t | 16,320 t | 7,316 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 18,511 t | 16,529 t | 1,982 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Haiti or New Zealand?
- Haiti, at 17,930 t against 16,239 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Haiti and New Zealand?
- 1,691 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and New Zealand rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Haiti ranks 110th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).