Hungary vs Mali: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 119,107 t against 100,991 t in Hungary, a difference of 18,116 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 49th and Mali ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73,508 t | 10,306 t | 63,203 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 92,585 t | 13,545 t | 79,040 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 116,919 t | 19,443 t | 97,476 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 97,849 t | 34,979 t | 62,870 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 94,951 t | 46,778 t | 48,172 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 97,554 t | 86,094 t | 11,460 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 90,407 t | 107,962 t | 17,556 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Hungary or Mali?
- Mali, at 119,107 t against 100,991 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Hungary and Mali?
- 18,116 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Mali rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 49th and Mali ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).