Iceland vs Seychelles: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Iceland
- Seychelles
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 98.12 t against 61.21 t in Seychelles, a difference of 36.91 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.6 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.
Iceland ranks 192nd and Seychelles ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Seychelles in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 48.35 t | 239.57 t | 191.22 t | Seychelles |
| 1970s | 50.79 t | 152.7 t | 101.91 t | Seychelles |
| 1980s | 78.17 t | 114.08 t | 35.91 t | Seychelles |
| 1990s | 65.84 t | 55.64 t | 10.2 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 74.97 t | 53.89 t | 21.08 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 79.65 t | 52.21 t | 27.44 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 97.75 t | 58.79 t | 38.95 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Iceland or Seychelles?
- Iceland, at 98.12 t against 61.21 t in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Iceland and Seychelles?
- 36.91 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Seychelles?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Seychelles rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Iceland ranks 192nd and Seychelles ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).