Israel vs New Zealand: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 16,239 t against 15,014 t in Israel, a difference of 1,225 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 113th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,846 t | 6,249 t | 3,598 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 15,946 t | 8,542 t | 7,404 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 18,316 t | 10,888 t | 7,428 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 15,542 t | 13,815 t | 1,726 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 15,475 t | 15,075 t | 400.18 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 15,632 t | 16,320 t | 688.2 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 14,929 t | 16,529 t | 1,600 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 16,239 t against 15,014 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Israel and New Zealand?
- 1,225 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 113th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).