Israel vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 17,754 t against 15,014 t in Israel, a difference of 2,740 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 125th and South Sudan ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15,673 t | 14,163 t | 1,509 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 14,929 t | 16,912 t | 1,983 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Israel or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 17,754 t against 15,014 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Israel and South Sudan?
- 2,740 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Israel and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 125th and South Sudan ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).