Japan vs Mali: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Japan
117,073 t
in 2023
Mali
119,107 t
in 2023
Japan rank
53rd
Mali rank
52nd

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Japan
  • Mali
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 119,107 t against 117,073 t in Japan, a difference of 2,034 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 53rd and Mali ranks 52nd of 201 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 205,172 t 10,306 t 194,867 t Japan
1970s 169,506 t 13,545 t 155,961 t Japan
1980s 168,529 t 19,443 t 149,085 t Japan
1990s 152,904 t 34,979 t 117,925 t Japan
2000s 139,711 t 46,778 t 92,933 t Japan
2010s 125,195 t 86,094 t 39,101 t Japan
2020s 120,232 t 107,962 t 12,270 t Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Japan or Mali?
Mali, at 119,107 t against 117,073 t in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Japan and Mali?
2,034 t, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Mali rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Japan ranks 53rd and Mali ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).