Kiribati vs Kuwait: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Kiribati
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1,216 t against 1,198 t in Kuwait, a difference of 18 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 165th and Kuwait ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 5 and Kuwait in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 414.74 t | 17.55 t | 397.19 t | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 452.05 t | 62.61 t | 389.44 t | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 622.09 t | 200.5 t | 421.58 t | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 581.99 t | 345.21 t | 236.78 t | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 839.36 t | 904.29 t | 64.93 t | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 1,193 t | 1,474 t | 280.58 t | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 1,159 t | 1,120 t | 39.3 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Kiribati or Kuwait?
- Kiribati, at 1,216 t against 1,198 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Kiribati and Kuwait?
- 18 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Kuwait?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Kuwait rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Kiribati ranks 165th and Kuwait ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).