Latvia, Republic of vs New Zealand: Outputs β Cropland potassium
Outputs β Cropland potassium over time
- Latvia, Republic of
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 17,964 t against 16,239 t in New Zealand, a difference of 1,725 t.
That makes Latvia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.
Latvia, Republic of ranks 109th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia, Republic of averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia, Republic of | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,849 t | 14,339 t | 1,490 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 12,549 t | 15,075 t | 2,526 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 16,618 t | 16,320 t | 298.49 t | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 20,033 t | 16,529 t | 3,505 t | Latvia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs β cropland potassium, Latvia, Republic of or New Zealand?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 17,964 t against 16,239 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs β cropland potassium between Latvia, Republic of and New Zealand?
- 1,725 t, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia, Republic of and New Zealand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia, Republic of and New Zealand rank globally for outputs β cropland potassium?
- Latvia, Republic of ranks 109th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).