Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Latvia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 19,439 t against 17,964 t in Latvia, a difference of 1,475 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 121st and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,849 t | 6,255 t | 6,594 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 12,549 t | 11,066 t | 1,483 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 16,618 t | 18,783 t | 2,164 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 20,033 t | 19,309 t | 724.65 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Latvia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 19,439 t against 17,964 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 1,475 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Latvia ranks 121st and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).