Lebanon vs Switzerland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Lebanon
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 14,018 t against 13,273 t in Lebanon, a difference of 745 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Lebanon ranks 129th and Switzerland ranks 127th of 201 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,679 t | 15,059 t | 10,380 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 5,703 t | 15,044 t | 9,341 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 7,091 t | 17,368 t | 10,277 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 12,623 t | 17,611 t | 4,987 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 11,835 t | 17,092 t | 5,258 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 12,446 t | 16,522 t | 4,077 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 13,331 t | 14,779 t | 1,448 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Lebanon or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 14,018 t against 13,273 t in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Lebanon and Switzerland?
- 745 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Switzerland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Lebanon ranks 129th and Switzerland ranks 127th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).