Luxembourg vs Suriname: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1,019 t against 916.28 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 102.72 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 170th and Suriname ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,155 t | 1,356 t | 201 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,041 t | 1,916 t | 875.15 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 947.04 t | 1,153 t | 205.62 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1,019 t against 916.28 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 102.72 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Suriname rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 170th and Suriname ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).