Luxembourg vs Tonga: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Luxembourg
916.28 t
in 2023
Tonga
650.48 t
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
170th
Tonga rank
171st

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Tonga
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 916.28 t against 650.48 t in Tonga, a difference of 265.8 t.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.4 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 170th and Tonga ranks 171st of 201 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 1,155 t 739.23 t 415.31 t Luxembourg
2010s 1,041 t 814.98 t 226.31 t Luxembourg
2020s 947.04 t 636.47 t 310.57 t Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Tonga?
Luxembourg, at 916.28 t against 650.48 t in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Tonga?
265.8 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tonga?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Tonga rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Luxembourg ranks 170th and Tonga ranks 171st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).