Madagascar vs Papua New Guinea: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Madagascar
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 53,104 t against 51,784 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1,320 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 87th and Papua New Guinea ranks 89th of 201 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19,174 t | 13,343 t | 5,830 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 24,571 t | 17,377 t | 7,194 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 29,166 t | 22,740 t | 6,426 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 33,055 t | 27,478 t | 5,577 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 39,333 t | 33,968 t | 5,365 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 47,889 t | 46,839 t | 1,051 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 51,168 t | 50,046 t | 1,122 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Madagascar or Papua New Guinea?
- Madagascar, at 53,104 t against 51,784 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Madagascar and Papua New Guinea?
- 1,320 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Papua New Guinea rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Madagascar ranks 87th and Papua New Guinea ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).