Malawi vs Peru: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Malawi
163,866 t
in 2023
Peru
168,847 t
in 2023
Malawi rank
43rd
Peru rank
41st

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Malawi
  • Peru
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 168,847 t against 163,866 t in Malawi, a difference of 4,981 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 10,995 t 52,441 t 41,446 t Peru
1970s 16,867 t 58,264 t 41,396 t Peru
1980s 21,642 t 58,782 t 37,140 t Peru
1990s 31,049 t 73,387 t 42,338 t Peru
2000s 56,907 t 110,862 t 53,954 t Peru
2010s 110,637 t 144,744 t 34,107 t Peru
2020s 157,825 t 168,774 t 10,950 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Malawi or Peru?
Peru, at 168,847 t against 163,866 t in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Malawi and Peru?
4,981 t, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Malawi ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).