Malawi vs Romania: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Malawi
- Romania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 163,866 t against 146,926 t in Romania, a difference of 16,940 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Malawi ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,995 t | 107,135 t | 96,140 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 16,867 t | 144,415 t | 127,548 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 21,642 t | 177,633 t | 155,991 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 31,049 t | 133,324 t | 102,274 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 56,907 t | 126,336 t | 69,429 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 110,637 t | 164,139 t | 53,502 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 157,825 t | 149,997 t | 7,828 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Malawi or Romania?
- Malawi, at 163,866 t against 146,926 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Malawi and Romania?
- 16,940 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Malawi ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).