Malaysia vs Viet Nam: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Malaysia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 484,455 t against 405,095 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 79,360 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Malaysia ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 5 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,523 t | 56,603 t | 31,080 t | Viet Nam |
| 1970s | 57,355 t | 70,368 t | 13,013 t | Viet Nam |
| 1980s | 134,914 t | 112,759 t | 22,156 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 236,382 t | 169,027 t | 67,355 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 378,764 t | 266,982 t | 111,782 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 484,906 t | 363,015 t | 121,891 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 485,961 t | 396,164 t | 89,798 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Malaysia or Viet Nam?
- Malaysia, at 484,455 t against 405,095 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Malaysia and Viet Nam?
- 79,360 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Viet Nam rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Malaysia ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).