Mauritania vs Puerto Rico: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritania
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 2,866 t against 2,801 t in Mauritania, a difference of 65 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Mauritania ranks 154th and Puerto Rico ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 809.31 t | 14,006 t | 13,197 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 590.84 t | 7,015 t | 6,424 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 866.42 t | 4,326 t | 3,460 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 1,274 t | 2,456 t | 1,182 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 1,426 t | 2,295 t | 869.1 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 2,045 t | 2,655 t | 610.75 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 2,635 t | 2,808 t | 172.82 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Mauritania or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 2,866 t against 2,801 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Mauritania and Puerto Rico?
- 65 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Puerto Rico rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Mauritania ranks 154th and Puerto Rico ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).