Mauritius vs Solomon Islands: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritius
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 4,143 t against 3,955 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 188 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 149th and Solomon Islands ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,709 t | 1,344 t | 6,366 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 8,520 t | 1,706 t | 6,814 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 8,224 t | 2,538 t | 5,686 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 8,150 t | 2,955 t | 5,195 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 7,492 t | 3,768 t | 3,724 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 5,965 t | 3,346 t | 2,619 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 4,074 t | 3,850 t | 223.85 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Mauritius or Solomon Islands?
- Mauritius, at 4,143 t against 3,955 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Mauritius and Solomon Islands?
- 188 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Solomon Islands rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Mauritius ranks 149th and Solomon Islands ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).