Middle Africa vs Poland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Poland
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 580,800 t against 329,474 t in Poland, a difference of 251,326 t.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.8 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 26th and Poland ranks 26th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 139,122 t | 407,978 t | 268,856 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 164,842 t | 449,680 t | 284,839 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 189,875 t | 406,828 t | 216,953 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 231,294 t | 363,100 t | 131,805 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 275,981 t | 290,539 t | 14,558 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 483,080 t | 284,546 t | 198,534 t | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 564,116 t | 324,758 t | 239,358 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Poland?
- Middle Africa, at 580,800 t against 329,474 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Poland?
- 251,326 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Poland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 26th and Poland ranks 26th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).