Montenegro vs Qatar: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Montenegro
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 447.8 t against 423.17 t in Montenegro, a difference of 24.63 t.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 180th and Qatar ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 705.86 t | 194.09 t | 511.77 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 487.05 t | 218.37 t | 268.69 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 455.28 t | 377.27 t | 78.01 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Montenegro or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 447.8 t against 423.17 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Montenegro and Qatar?
- 24.63 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Qatar?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Qatar rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Montenegro ranks 180th and Qatar ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).