Mozambique vs Sudan (former): Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Mozambique
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 82,476 t against 79,778 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 2,698 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Mozambique ranks 67th and Sudan (former) ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,223 t | 34,485 t | 6,262 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 34,553 t | 46,307 t | 11,754 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 29,534 t | 47,804 t | 18,270 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 34,020 t | 54,413 t | 20,394 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 52,313 t | 74,064 t | 21,751 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 70,303 t | 72,122 t | 1,819 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Mozambique or Sudan (former)?
- Mozambique, at 82,476 t against 79,778 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Mozambique and Sudan (former)?
- 2,698 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Mozambique and Sudan (former) rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Mozambique ranks 67th and Sudan (former) ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).