Myanmar vs South Africa: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Myanmar
- South Africa
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 243,084 t against 213,865 t in South Africa, a difference of 29,219 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.
Myanmar ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42,069 t | 69,101 t | 27,032 t | South Africa |
| 1970s | 49,784 t | 99,690 t | 49,907 t | South Africa |
| 1980s | 79,985 t | 115,242 t | 35,257 t | South Africa |
| 1990s | 103,616 t | 118,170 t | 14,554 t | South Africa |
| 2000s | 209,484 t | 136,167 t | 73,316 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 264,430 t | 159,039 t | 105,390 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 244,738 t | 201,180 t | 43,558 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Myanmar or South Africa?
- Myanmar, at 243,084 t against 213,865 t in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Myanmar and South Africa?
- 29,219 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and South Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and South Africa rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Myanmar ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).