Nigeria vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Nigeria
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 1.35 million t against 1.04 million t in Nigeria, a difference of 309,660 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.3 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Nigeria ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 201 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 534,821 t | 724,436 t | 189,615 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 694,642 t | 756,431 t | 61,789 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 834,801 t | 1.01 million t | 170,823 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 1.02 million t | 1.27 million t | 251,265 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Nigeria or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 1.35 million t against 1.04 million t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Nigeria and Russian Federation?
- 309,660 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Nigeria ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).