Northern America vs Ukraine: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Northern America
- Ukraine
How they compare
Northern America currently reports 5.35 million t against 669,062 t in Ukraine, a difference of 4.68 million t.
That makes Northern America's figure about 8.0 times Ukraine's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.
Northern America ranks 4th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 10 groups.
Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern America | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.78 million t | 400,528 t | 3.38 million t | Northern America |
| 2000s | 4.23 million t | 421,018 t | 3.81 million t | Northern America |
| 2010s | 5.06 million t | 639,910 t | 4.42 million t | Northern America |
| 2020s | 5.35 million t | 669,197 t | 4.68 million t | Northern America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Northern America or Ukraine?
- Northern America, at 5.35 million t against 669,062 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Northern America and Ukraine?
- 4.68 million t, with Northern America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern America and Ukraine rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Northern America ranks 4th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).