Oman vs Slovenia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Oman
- Slovenia
How they compare
Oman currently reports 6,299 t against 4,312 t in Slovenia, a difference of 1,987 t.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.5 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Oman ranks 144th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,796 t | 5,686 t | 3,890 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 2,134 t | 5,340 t | 3,206 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3,463 t | 4,517 t | 1,055 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 5,969 t | 4,548 t | 1,421 t | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Oman or Slovenia?
- Oman, at 6,299 t against 4,312 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Oman and Slovenia?
- 1,987 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Slovenia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Oman ranks 144th and Slovenia ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).