Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 54,541 t against 51,784 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 2,757 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13,343 t | 15,254 t | 1,910 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 17,377 t | 23,550 t | 6,173 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 22,740 t | 31,915 t | 9,175 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 27,478 t | 33,470 t | 5,992 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 33,968 t | 34,603 t | 634.71 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 46,839 t | 37,789 t | 9,049 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 50,046 t | 52,296 t | 2,250 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 54,541 t against 51,784 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 2,757 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).