Paraguay vs Uzbekistan: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Paraguay
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 229,340 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 4,496 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Paraguay ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,317 t | 150,178 t | 77,860 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 110,177 t | 159,462 t | 49,285 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 200,014 t | 188,125 t | 11,888 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 213,072 t | 210,824 t | 2,248 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Paraguay or Uzbekistan?
- Paraguay, at 229,340 t against 224,844 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Paraguay and Uzbekistan?
- 4,496 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Paraguay and Uzbekistan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Paraguay ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).