Portugal vs Tajikistan: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Portugal
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 35,244 t against 33,430 t in Portugal, a difference of 1,814 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 94th and Tajikistan ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,255 t | 18,326 t | 12,929 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 27,446 t | 24,034 t | 3,412 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 26,443 t | 29,991 t | 3,548 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 31,574 t | 34,904 t | 3,330 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Portugal or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 35,244 t against 33,430 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Portugal and Tajikistan?
- 1,814 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Portugal and Tajikistan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Portugal ranks 94th and Tajikistan ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).