Republic of Korea vs Rwanda: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Republic of Korea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 61,370 t against 59,847 t in Rwanda, a difference of 1,523 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 59,865 t | 17,743 t | 42,122 t | Republic of Korea |
| 1970s | 78,460 t | 26,037 t | 52,423 t | Republic of Korea |
| 1980s | 77,812 t | 35,800 t | 42,013 t | Republic of Korea |
| 1990s | 73,777 t | 34,134 t | 39,642 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 72,376 t | 46,802 t | 25,574 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 65,044 t | 53,210 t | 11,834 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 61,499 t | 58,481 t | 3,018 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Republic of Korea or Rwanda?
- Republic of Korea, at 61,370 t against 59,847 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Republic of Korea and Rwanda?
- 1,523 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Korea and Rwanda rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Republic of Korea ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).