Republic of Moldova vs Western Asia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Western Asia
How they compare
Western Asia currently reports 903,560 t against 31,581 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 871,979 t.
That makes Western Asia's figure about 28.6 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Western Asia has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 16th and Western Asia ranks 19th of 18 countries.
Western Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,262 t | 683,736 t | 652,474 t | Western Asia |
| 2000s | 24,856 t | 734,651 t | 709,794 t | Western Asia |
| 2010s | 28,113 t | 772,864 t | 744,751 t | Western Asia |
| 2020s | 28,463 t | 868,236 t | 839,773 t | Western Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Republic of Moldova or Western Asia?
- Western Asia, at 903,560 t against 31,581 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Republic of Moldova and Western Asia?
- 871,979 t, with Western Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Western Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Western Asia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 16th and Western Asia ranks 19th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).