Romania vs Yugoslav SFR: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Romania
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 153,090 t against 146,926 t in Romania, a difference of 6,164 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 46th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 107,135 t | 104,028 t | 3,107 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 144,415 t | 122,635 t | 21,780 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 177,633 t | 139,046 t | 38,587 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 138,273 t | 139,133 t | 860 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Romania or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 153,090 t against 146,926 t in Romania as of 1991.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Romania and Yugoslav SFR?
- 6,164 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Romania and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Romania ranks 46th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).