Rwanda vs Zambia: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Rwanda
59,847 t
in 2023
Zambia
57,302 t
in 2023
Rwanda rank
82nd
Zambia rank
85th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 59,847 t against 57,302 t in Zambia, a difference of 2,545 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 17,743 t 5,401 t 12,342 t Rwanda
1970s 26,037 t 8,683 t 17,354 t Rwanda
1980s 35,800 t 10,395 t 25,405 t Rwanda
1990s 34,134 t 12,909 t 21,225 t Rwanda
2000s 46,802 t 19,932 t 26,870 t Rwanda
2010s 53,210 t 38,650 t 14,560 t Rwanda
2020s 58,481 t 49,160 t 9,321 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Rwanda or Zambia?
Rwanda, at 59,847 t against 57,302 t in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Rwanda and Zambia?
2,545 t, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Zambia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Rwanda ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).