Seychelles vs Singapore: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Seychelles
- Singapore
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 61.21 t against 56.49 t in Singapore, a difference of 4.72 t.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Seychelles ranks 194th and Singapore ranks 195th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Seychelles averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 239.57 t | 279.06 t | 39.49 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 152.7 t | 311.93 t | 159.22 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 114.08 t | 332.19 t | 218.11 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 55.64 t | 25.84 t | 29.8 t | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 53.89 t | 47.32 t | 6.57 t | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 52.21 t | 69.46 t | 17.25 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 58.79 t | 66.34 t | 7.55 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Seychelles or Singapore?
- Seychelles, at 61.21 t against 56.49 t in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Seychelles and Singapore?
- 4.72 t, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Seychelles and Singapore rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Seychelles ranks 194th and Singapore ranks 195th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).