Slovakia vs Tajikistan: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Slovakia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 35,244 t against 34,136 t in Slovakia, a difference of 1,108 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 93rd and Tajikistan ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovakia averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29,787 t | 17,834 t | 11,952 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 26,458 t | 24,034 t | 2,424 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 28,792 t | 29,991 t | 1,199 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 32,277 t | 34,904 t | 2,627 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Slovakia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 35,244 t against 34,136 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Slovakia and Tajikistan?
- 1,108 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Tajikistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Tajikistan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Slovakia ranks 93rd and Tajikistan ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).