Sweden vs Tajikistan: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Sweden
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 36,671 t against 35,244 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 1,427 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 102nd and Tajikistan ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44,919 t | 18,326 t | 26,593 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 43,169 t | 24,034 t | 19,134 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 42,923 t | 29,991 t | 12,932 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 42,982 t | 34,904 t | 8,077 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Sweden or Tajikistan?
- Sweden, at 36,671 t against 35,244 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Sweden and Tajikistan?
- 1,427 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Tajikistan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Sweden ranks 102nd and Tajikistan ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).