Türkiye vs USSR: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Türkiye
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 1.88 million t against 658,693 t in Türkiye, a difference of 1.22 million t.
That makes USSR's figure about 2.9 times Türkiye's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Türkiye ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 6th of 18 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Türkiye | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 190,785 t | 1.78 million t | 1.58 million t | USSR |
| 1970s | 268,064 t | 2.19 million t | 1.92 million t | USSR |
| 1980s | 360,439 t | 2.16 million t | 1.80 million t | USSR |
| 1990s | 434,114 t | 2.08 million t | 1.65 million t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Türkiye or USSR?
- USSR, at 1.88 million t against 658,693 t in Türkiye as of 1991.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Türkiye and USSR?
- 1.22 million t, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Türkiye and USSR rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Türkiye ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 6th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).