United Republic of Tanzania vs USSR: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- United Republic of Tanzania
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 1.88 million t against 227,059 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.65 million t.
That makes USSR's figure about 8.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th and USSR ranks 6th of 18 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Republic of Tanzania | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35,435 t | 1.78 million t | 1.74 million t | USSR |
| 1970s | 49,334 t | 2.19 million t | 2.14 million t | USSR |
| 1980s | 65,018 t | 2.16 million t | 2.09 million t | USSR |
| 1990s | 74,500 t | 2.08 million t | 2.01 million t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, United Republic of Tanzania or USSR?
- USSR, at 1.88 million t against 227,059 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1991.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between United Republic of Tanzania and USSR?
- 1.65 million t, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do United Republic of Tanzania and USSR rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th and USSR ranks 6th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).