Democratic Republic of Congo vs Costa Rica: Ozone depleting substance consumption

Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2021
Costa Rica
0
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
1st
Costa Rica rank
1st

Ozone depleting substance consumption over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Costa Rica
02.557.510198620032021

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Costa Rica ranks 1st of 168 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1980s 0 2.25 2.25 Costa Rica
1990s 7.2 0 7.2 Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 1.7 0 1.7 Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0 0 0
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ozone depleting substance consumption, Democratic Republic of Congo or Costa Rica?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0 against 0 in Costa Rica as of 2021.
What is the difference in ozone depleting substance consumption between Democratic Republic of Congo and Costa Rica?
0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Costa Rica?
30 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Costa Rica rank globally for ozone depleting substance consumption?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Costa Rica ranks 1st of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Ozone depleting substance consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ozone depleting substance consumption
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,376 data points, 1986–2022
Last refreshed