Congo vs Suriname: Emissions of ozone-depleting substances
Emissions of ozone-depleting substances over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in Suriname, a difference of 0 ODP tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Suriname ahead.
Congo ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 168 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 1990s | 0.2833 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0.2833 ODP tonnes | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emissions of ozone-depleting substances, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in emissions of ozone-depleting substances between Congo and Suriname?
- 0 ODP tonnes, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for emissions of ozone-depleting substances?
- Congo ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Emissions of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Consumption of various controlled substances. These include Bromochloromethane (BCM), Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Methyl Bromide (MB), Methyl Chloroform (TCA) and Other Fully Halogenated CFCs. We assign zero to missing values for a given (year, country, chemical) triple. This is due to technical reasons, so that we are able to plot this variable using our Grapher stacked are charts.