El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Emissions of ozone-depleting substances
Emissions of ozone-depleting substances over time
- El Salvador
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 ODP tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
El Salvador ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 168 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0.1 ODP tonnes | 0.1 ODP tonnes | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 0.9111 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0.9111 ODP tonnes | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emissions of ozone-depleting substances, El Salvador or Papua New Guinea?
- El Salvador, at 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in emissions of ozone-depleting substances between El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 ODP tonnes, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for emissions of ozone-depleting substances?
- El Salvador ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Emissions of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Consumption of various controlled substances. These include Bromochloromethane (BCM), Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Methyl Bromide (MB), Methyl Chloroform (TCA) and Other Fully Halogenated CFCs. We assign zero to missing values for a given (year, country, chemical) triple. This is due to technical reasons, so that we are able to plot this variable using our Grapher stacked are charts.