Nauru vs Singapore: Ozone depleting substance consumption
Nauru
0
in 2021
Singapore
0
in 2021
Nauru rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Ozone depleting substance consumption over time
- Nauru
- Singapore
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 against 0 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 159.35 | 159.35 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0 | 2.94 | 2.94 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ozone depleting substance consumption, Nauru or Singapore?
- Nauru, at 0 against 0 in Singapore as of 2021.
- What is the difference in ozone depleting substance consumption between Nauru and Singapore?
- 0, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Singapore?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Nauru and Singapore rank globally for ozone depleting substance consumption?
- Nauru ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Ozone depleting substance consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.