Cuba vs Estonia: Ozone (O₃) concentration

Cuba
48 ppb
in 2015
Estonia
48 ppb
in 2015
Cuba rank
127th
Estonia rank
127th

Ozone (O₃) concentration over time

  • Cuba
  • Estonia
0204060199020022015

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 48 ppb against 48 ppb in Estonia, a difference of 0 ppb.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Estonia ahead.

Cuba ranks 127th and Estonia ranks 127th of 187 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 48.5 ppb 50.5 ppb 2 ppb Estonia
2000s 49 ppb 48.5 ppb 0.5 ppb Cuba
2010s 48 ppb 48 ppb 0 ppb

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ozone (o₃) concentration, Cuba or Estonia?
Cuba, at 48 ppb against 48 ppb in Estonia as of 2015.
What is the difference in ozone (o₃) concentration between Cuba and Estonia?
0 ppb, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for ozone (o₃) concentration?
Cuba ranks 127th and Estonia ranks 127th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Health Effects Institute (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Ozone (O₃) concentration. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ozone (O₃) concentration
Unit
ppb
Source
Health Effects Institute (2017) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,309 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Population-weighted average ozone (O₃) concentrations in parts per billion (ppb). Local concentrations of ozone are recorded and estimated at a 11x11km resolution. These values are subsequently weighted by population-density for calculation of nation-level average concentrations.