Cuba vs Malaysia: Ozone (O₃) concentration
Cuba
48 ppb
in 2015
Malaysia
48 ppb
in 2015
Cuba rank
127th
Malaysia rank
127th
Ozone (O₃) concentration over time
- Cuba
- Malaysia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 48 ppb against 48 ppb in Malaysia, a difference of 0 ppb.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Cuba ranks 127th and Malaysia ranks 127th of 187 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.5 ppb | 47.5 ppb | 1 ppb | Cuba |
| 2000s | 49 ppb | 45 ppb | 4 ppb | Cuba |
| 2010s | 48 ppb | 47.67 ppb | 0.3333 ppb | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ozone (o₃) concentration, Cuba or Malaysia?
- Cuba, at 48 ppb against 48 ppb in Malaysia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ozone (o₃) concentration between Cuba and Malaysia?
- 0 ppb, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malaysia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Cuba and Malaysia rank globally for ozone (o₃) concentration?
- Cuba ranks 127th and Malaysia ranks 127th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Health Effects Institute (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Ozone (O₃) concentration. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population-weighted average ozone (O₃) concentrations in parts per billion (ppb). Local concentrations of ozone are recorded and estimated at a 11x11km resolution. These values are subsequently weighted by population-density for calculation of nation-level average concentrations.