Chile vs Eswatini: Paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per capita
Chile
0.0262 t per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0209 t per person
in 2024
Chile rank
30th
Eswatini rank
31st
Paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per capita over time
- Chile
- Eswatini
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0262 t per person against 0.0209 t per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0053 t per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 30th and Eswatini ranks 31st of 178 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0361 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0354 t per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0297 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0292 t per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0263 t per person | 0.0169 t per person | 0.0094 t per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paper and paperboard — export quantity, per capita, Chile or Eswatini?
- Chile, at 0.0262 t per person against 0.0209 t per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in paper and paperboard — export quantity, per capita between Chile and Eswatini?
- 0.0053 t per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for paper and paperboard — export quantity, per capita?
- Chile ranks 30th and Eswatini ranks 31st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Paper and paperboard — Export quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.